Thursday, November 14, 2019
Defining Abnormality Essay -- Papers
Defining Abnormality                                                                                                                                                                                         One way of defining abnormality is in terms of characteristics or     behaviours that are statistically infrequent (the deviation from     statistical norms definition). However, this does not take into     account the desirability of a characteristic or behaviour. The     definition also fails to recognise that in all cultures large numbers     of people may engage in behaviours that constitute mental disorders. A     further problem is the failure to identify how far a person must     deviate before being ââ¬Ëabnormalââ¬â¢. Such decisions are difficult to make     and then consequently justify.       The deviation from ideal mental health definition proposes that     abnormal people do not possess characteristics that mental healthy     people do, or possess characteristics that mentally healthy people do     not.       This particular definition relies on value judgements about what     constitutes ideal mental health. It is also bound by culture,     era-dependent, and limited by the context in which behaviour occurs.       Abnormality has also been defined as a failure to function adequately     (by not achieving some sense of personal well-being and making some     contribution to a larger social group). Experiencing personal distress     or discomfort, causing distress to others, and behaving in an     unexpected or bizarre manner are often the reasons why people come to     the attention of psychologists. Many consider the failure to function     adequately definition as being the most useful single approach, and     the one clo...              ...ly rational,     and reflect accurately the unfortunate circumstances in which a person     is living. Attempts to put the blame on to the patient may inhibit     efforts to produce desirable behaviour.       Each of the models explain the origins of abnormality in different     ways. However, these models are not necessarily mutually exclusive,     since each is effectively examining a different aspect of the     individual. The biological model observes that learned behaviour can     be maladaptive whilst the cognitive model claims that thoughts can be     irrational and therefore also maladaptive. The behaviourist model     states that abnormal behaviour is learnt in the same way as other     types of behaviour through stimulus-response mechanisms and operant     conditioning. Each of the models is subject to certain practical and     ethical considerations also.                        
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.